further explanation needed with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "further explanation needed with" is not entirely correct in standard written English.
It can be used when indicating that additional clarification is required regarding a specific topic or issue. Example: "If you have any questions about the project, please let me know, as further explanation is needed with the budget allocation."

Science

News & Media

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

No further explanation needed for this app.

Huffington Post

There exists no ethics of torture; certain acts are wrong with no further explanation needed, just as certain rights are inalienable.

Huffington Post

Nothing more need be said, no further explanation needed.

The New York Times - Sports

No further explanation needed, thank you (as seen at PPQ).

The Guardian - Lifestyle

No further explanation needed.

Huffington Post

They will address the discrepancy with The Admissions Office and contact you if any further explanation is needed.

Duke University

No further explanation was needed beyond the aesthetic one.

Britannica

The setback to American values is so obvious and manifest that no further explanation is needed.

The Washington Post

No further explanation is needed.

HuffPost

If he was mad then no further explanation was needed.

Huffington Post

Add further explanation, if needed.

WikiHow

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Opt for more common and grammatically standard alternatives such as "further explanation is needed" or "additional clarification is required" to improve clarity and professionalism.

Common error

Avoid using "with" after "needed" in this context. It's more common and grammatically sound to say "further explanation is needed" without the preposition.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "further explanation needed with" functions as a request or indication that more details or clarification are required regarding a particular subject. Ludwig AI notes it is acceptable, but not necessarily standard.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

30%

News & Media

30%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Encyclopedias

10%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "further explanation needed with" is a phrase used to indicate that additional clarification is required. While Ludwig AI identifies it as acceptable, it's not the most standard or grammatically precise construction. More common alternatives such as "further explanation is needed" or "additional clarification is required" are generally preferred, especially in formal contexts. The phrase appears across various sources, including science, news, and media, but its frequency is rare. Therefore, it is advisable to use alternative phrases for clearer and more professional communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

further explanation is required

Replaces "needed with" with a more formal and common passive construction.

more explanation is necessary

Replaces "needed with" with a more direct and assertive "is necessary".

additional explanation is needed

Substitutes "further" with "additional" for emphasis on the extra explanation.

a deeper explanation is required

Highlights the necessity of an explanation that goes into more depth.

more clarification is required

Uses "clarification" instead of "explanation", implying a need to make something clearer.

clarification is needed

Shortens the phrase while maintaining the core meaning of requiring more clarity.

further details are necessary

Shifts focus to the need for specific "details" to expand on the initial information.

additional information is necessary

Emphasizes the necessity of "information" supplementing what's already provided.

an elaboration is needed

Emphasizes the need for a more detailed account or expansion.

this requires more context

Shifts the focus to the need for a broader understanding of the circumstances.

FAQs

What's a more standard way to say "further explanation needed with"?

More standard alternatives include "further explanation is needed" or "additional clarification is required".

Is it grammatically correct to say "further explanation needed with"?

While understandable, "further explanation needed with" is not considered standard English. It's better to use constructions like "further explanation is needed".

When should I use "further explanation needed with"?

It's best to avoid "further explanation needed with" in formal writing. In informal contexts, it might be acceptable, but clearer alternatives are generally preferred.

What's the difference between "further explanation needed" and "further explanation needed with"?

"Further explanation needed" is a concise and grammatically correct phrase. Adding "with" is unnecessary and weakens the sentence. Stick to "further explanation needed".