funds allocated for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "funds allocated for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the distribution of financial resources for a specific purpose or project. Example: "The funds allocated for the new community center will help improve local facilities and services."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

There are no federal funds allocated for such reimbursements.

The New York Times

It will also receive the bulk of the public funds allocated for the Games.

The Guardian

Instead, she pulled the new network together in secret, using funds allocated for other purposes.

The New York Times

Activists and NGOs have accused the state of mismanaging funds allocated for flood relief and prevention.

The Guardian

Between 1991 and 1995, it discovered, only 13% of funds allocated for schools ever reached them.

The Economist

Not long afterward, it was discovered that a lieutenant in Jennings had stolen federal funds allocated for drunk-driving checks.

The New Yorker

Two-thirds of this hasn't been spent and it also includes funds allocated for undefined periods into the future.

The Guardian

"Let's see funds allocated for our three projects and have them started before they approve" the subway project, he said.

The New York Times

Her agency has asked for $495,000, about a third of the total navigator funds allocated for Virginia.

The New York Times

Funds allocated for social projects would end up lining the pockets of the older generation or were misspent.

The Economist

The funds allocated for a comprehensive tobacco control program fall well below the recommendations of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "funds allocated for", ensure the purpose for which the funds are allocated is clearly and specifically stated to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid vague descriptions of what the "funds allocated for" are intended to achieve. Instead of saying 'funds allocated for improvement', specify 'funds allocated for improving road infrastructure' for clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "funds allocated for" functions as a determiner phrase, specifying that certain financial resources have been designated or assigned for a particular purpose. Ludwig's examples showcase its use in various contexts, emphasizing the directed use of financial resources.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

61%

Science

25%

Formal & Business

9%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Academia

2%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "funds allocated for" is a common and grammatically correct way to indicate that financial resources have been designated for a specific purpose. As Ludwig AI indicates, it is widely used across various contexts, particularly in news, science, and formal business settings. When using this phrase, clarity and specificity are key to avoiding ambiguity. Alternatives like "monies designated for" or "resources earmarked for" can add nuance depending on the context. Ultimately, understanding the communicative purpose and register will ensure effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

monies designated for

Uses 'monies' instead of 'funds', implying a more formal tone, and 'designated' instead of 'allocated', suggesting a specific assignment.

resources earmarked for

Replaces 'funds' with 'resources', broadening the scope beyond just money, and 'earmarked' for 'allocated', indicating a prior commitment.

budget assigned for

Substitutes 'funds' with 'budget', focusing on the financial plan, and 'assigned' for 'allocated', suggesting a direct assignment of resources.

financing provided for

Replaces 'funds' with 'financing', emphasizing the financial aspect, and 'provided' for 'allocated', highlighting the act of supplying the resources.

capital reserved for

Uses 'capital' instead of 'funds', focusing on investment-related money, and 'reserved' for 'allocated', suggesting that the funds are specifically held back for the purpose.

investment directed toward

Replaces 'funds' with 'investment', emphasizing the financial commitment, and 'directed toward' for 'allocated for', showing the intended path of the resources.

grants awarded for

Substitutes 'funds' with 'grants', focusing on non-repayable financial aid, and 'awarded' for 'allocated', highlighting the act of bestowing the resources.

subsidies granted for

Replaces 'funds' with 'subsidies', emphasizing financial assistance for specific sectors, and 'granted' for 'allocated', highlighting the official approval for resource distribution.

revenues dedicated to

Uses 'revenues' instead of 'funds', emphasizing the income source, and 'dedicated to' for 'allocated for', showing a specific and committed use.

resources distributed to

Substitutes 'funds' with 'resources', encompassing a broader set of assets beyond just money, and 'distributed to' for 'allocated for', focusing on the act of dispersing resources.

FAQs

How to use "funds allocated for" in a sentence?

The phrase "funds allocated for" is used to indicate that financial resources have been designated for a specific purpose. For example, 'The "funds allocated for education" will be used to improve school facilities'.

What can I say instead of "funds allocated for"?

You can use alternatives like "monies designated for", "resources earmarked for", or "budget assigned for" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "funds allocated for" or "funds allotted to"?

Both "funds allocated for" and "funds allotted to" are correct and convey similar meanings. "Funds allocated for" emphasizes the intended purpose, while "funds allotted to" highlights the recipient or area receiving the funds.

What's the difference between "funds allocated for" and "funds designated for"?

While both phrases indicate resources set aside, "funds allocated for" suggests a formal distribution process, whereas "funds designated for" implies a specific purpose has been determined, not necessarily that the funds have been formally distributed.