Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

funded to

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "funded to" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate the extent or limit of financial support provided for a project or initiative. Example: "The research project was funded to a total of $500,000, allowing for extensive data collection and analysis."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

That's what we are funded to do.

"We were being funded to do screening".

News & Media

The New York Times

The company, he said, is "fully funded" to continue business.

News & Media

The New York Times

I went, fully funded, to a good Maine College and partly funded to the MBA program at Wharton.

News & Media

The New York Times

The bank became operational last November, funded to 2016 with £3.8bn of taxpayers' money.

News & Media

The Guardian

It often indicates that it isn't well enough funded to be truly world class.

This means both providers are well enough funded to keep ­running.

News & Media

The Guardian

A divorce module has been funded to the tune of £75,000 by the MoJ.

News & Media

The Guardian
Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

3 human-written examples

I would rather medicine was being state-funded to the absolute hilt".

News & Media

The Guardian

They're mostly self-funded to date.

News & Media

TechCrunch

The company is self-funded to date.

News & Media

TechCrunch

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "funded to", ensure clarity about the specific purpose or activity being supported. Be precise about what the funding enables.

Common error

Avoid assuming that "funded to" implies comprehensive coverage of all related expenses. Clarify any limitations or specific allocations within the funding agreement.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.4/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "funded to" functions as a passive construction indicating the purpose or extent of financial support provided. As Ludwig AI indicates, it describes what an entity or project is financially enabled to do. For example, "The research was funded to develop new treatments."

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

37%

News & Media

34%

Formal & Business

13%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Reference

5%

Social Media

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "funded to" is a versatile and commonly used expression that indicates the intended purpose or extent of financial support. As Ludwig AI confirms, its grammatical correctness and frequent usage across various contexts, including news, science, and business, make it a reliable choice for expressing financial allocation. While related phrases like "financed for" and "supported for" can offer nuanced alternatives, understanding the specific context and desired emphasis is crucial. It is important to use the phrase with clarity, ensuring that the scope and limitations of the funding are well-defined.

FAQs

How can I use "funded to" in a sentence?

You can use "funded to" to describe the purpose for which money or resources are allocated. For example, "The project was funded to develop new technologies."

What are some alternatives to "funded to"?

You can use alternatives such as "financed for", "supported for", or "granted for" depending on the specific context.

What's the difference between "funded to" and "funded for"?

While both phrases are similar, "funded to" typically implies a direct purpose or intended outcome, while "funded for" might indicate a broader area or category of support.

Is "funded to" considered formal or informal language?

"Funded to" is generally considered acceptable in both formal and informal contexts, but it's essential to consider your audience and the overall tone of your writing.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.4/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: