Sentence examples for fundamental repercussions from inspiring English sources
The phrase "fundamental repercussions" is correct and appropriate to use in written English
It refers to the significant and far-reaching consequences or effects of something. Example: The decision to cut funding for education will have fundamental repercussions on the future development of our society.
The reputation of parliament is at stake on the MPs' pay vote, but the example it sets could well have fundamental repercussions for the economy at large.
This disconnect (the calm voices analyzing the play as slowed-down theme music drowns out the real-world atmosphere of the game -- you know, the sounds and images that remind us that this game is real and has real-world repercussions) is fundamental to the NFL's survival.
Repercussions would be fairly fundamental to the way computer security works.
When politicians in established democracies such as the UK threaten to leave the ECHR for essentially domestic reasons, this is likely to have negative repercussions on the respect of fundamental freedoms in Europe's younger democracies.
The failure of the Chilean revolution had significant repercussions in Europe, where it led to a fundamental reorientation of the left in several countries (notably, Spain, France and Italy) and to certainty that in order to generate radical transformations in society, a broad consensus was needed, rather than a razor-thin electoral majority.
Mr. Dror, a political science professor, criticized the news media for what he called a "disproportionate focus" on the political repercussions of the report at the expense of the fundamental systemic problems the report raised.
This rivalry over which Democrat becomes the next Senate Majority Leader is a fundamental fight over policy - diplomacy vs. war - albeit with political repercussions from the Party's disciplinarians.
But the repercussions for cyclists and pedestrians of maintaining the status quo is more fundamental: over-dramatising it only slightly, their streets are taken from them.
Alexander will go further in his criticism of the war than just the fundamental error of the absence of weapons of mass destruction, arguing that long-term repercussions were not considered.
How is it that the fundamental source of so much human suffering is so often ignored by those who study its repercussions?
We are very grateful to them, because we think that this complex topic is of fundamental importance not only in terms of nosography and classification but even more so for its significant repercussions on research and clinical practice.
