"fundamental reasoning" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is typically used to describe the basic or underlying thought process or logic behind a certain idea or argument. Example: The success of this project relies on our fundamental reasoning that investing in renewable energy is the key to sustainable development.
Professor Turley suggests that the fundamental reasoning of Reynolds, which said polygamy "fetters the people in stationary despotism," is outdated and has been swept away by cases like Lawrence.
Just like your Uncle Max, public intellectuals often have the bad habit of spouting off on subjects they know little about; cannot stop themselves from offering erroneous predictions; lack the fundamental reasoning skills to construct or understand an argument; and have little or no influence on events or even public opinion.
The fundamental reasoning task in IA is to find a scenario that is consistent with the given information.
We sketch a partial answer by considering the fundamental reasoning pattern behind design, and then looking at the core design practices of framing and frame creation.
This fundamental reasoning, based on the observation that the depolarization block occurring during evoked seizures represents an upper threshold for neuronal firing, also supports replacing a sigmoidal nonlinearity by a Gaussian-like activation function.
One fundamental reasoning in favor of this education points to a parallelism between natural speech acquisition and purely auditory based musical training because the former also goes without any visual cues and is exclusively based on auditory feature learning (Kuhl 2003).
In this line of reasoning, the fundamental reason why resources and assets are brought under common ownership in a firm is due to incentive problems that may arise in situations of high asset specificity and a proclivity to opportunism (Williamson 1985).
Computing the minimal representation of a given set of constraints (a CSP) over the Point Algebra (PA) is a fundamental temporal reasoning problem.
This ability to transfer, as it's known, is fundamental to scientific reasoning and is among the highest goals of teachers at all levels.
In this sense formal ontologies make it possible to represent that fundamental function of reasoning consisting in categorization (classification).
On this matter he distinguished three different fundamental ways of reasoning: deduction, induction and retroduction (usually translated by abduction).
