fund to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "fund to" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It is unclear without additional context, as "fund" typically requires a direct object or a preposition to indicate what is being funded or the purpose of the funding. Example: "We need to allocate funds to support the new project."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

54 human-written examples

Fund to Halt the Crisis?

The New York Times

• New children's fund to tackle child poverty.

The Guardian

OPEC also established an international fund to aid developing countries.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The importance of these factors varies from fund to fund.

The New York Times

Donate to our legal fund to help us change that".

The New Yorker

RateSetter operates a provision fund to cushion its lenders (savers).

Independent

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

6 human-written examples

The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria.

Huffington Post

The Global Fund to combat AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria d.

Huffington Post

RIKEN Incentive Research Fund to Masatoshi Takagi.

eLife

Burroughs Wellcome Fund to Aviv Regev.

eLife

Burroughs Wellcome Fund to Jayakrishna Ambati.

eLife

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use correct prepositions, such as "for" or "towards", when indicating the purpose of funding. For example, use "fund for research" or "fund towards development" instead of "fund to".

Common error

Avoid using "to" directly after "fund" to express purpose. "To" usually indicates direction or infinitive verbs. Instead, opt for prepositions like "for", "towards", or rephrase the sentence to use a gerund (e.g., "funding research").

Linguistic Context

The phrase "fund to" typically attempts to function as a verb followed by a preposition indicating the purpose of the funding. However, as Ludwig AI points out, this construction is generally grammatically incorrect and needs to be revised to adhere to standard English grammar.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

41%

Science

35%

Formal & Business

9%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Reference

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "fund to" appears frequently, it is generally considered grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI emphasizes the importance of using correct prepositions such as "for" or rephrasing to use "funding" as a gerund. Examples from various sources including news, science, and business, illustrate the contexts where the intended meaning is to allocate resources. To ensure clarity and correctness, it's advisable to use alternatives like "allocate funds for" or "provide funding for". By adopting these practices, writers can avoid grammatical errors and communicate their intentions effectively.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

allocate funds for

This alternative uses a more common and grammatically correct verb, "allocate", to indicate the act of setting aside money for a specific reason.

provide funding for

This phrase substitutes "fund" with the noun "funding", creating a clearer and more grammatically sound expression.

establish a fund for

This alternative focuses on the creation of a financial resource dedicated to a specific cause.

create a fund to support

This variation specifies that a fund is being created to provide assistance or resources.

dedicate resources to

This phrase broadens the concept to include resources beyond just money, such as time or expertise.

invest in

This alternative suggests a financial contribution with the expectation of future returns or benefits.

finance

A more concise verb meaning to provide the money needed for something.

subsidize

This alternative implies providing financial assistance to lower the cost of something.

grant money for

This phrase specifies that money is being awarded for a particular purpose.

sponsor

Suggests providing funds in exchange for recognition or advertising.

FAQs

How can I correctly express the purpose of funding something?

Instead of "fund to", use prepositions like "for" (e.g., "fund for education"), "towards" (e.g., "fund towards development"), or rephrase using "funding" as a gerund (e.g., "funding scientific research").

What are some alternatives to the incorrect phrase "fund to"?

Grammatically correct alternatives include "allocate funds for", "provide funding for", or "establish a fund for", depending on the intended meaning.

Is "fund to" ever correct in English?

Generally, "fund to" is not considered grammatically correct. It's usually better to use phrases like "fund for" or "funding [activity]" to express the intended meaning.

How can I avoid making mistakes when talking about funding?

Pay close attention to the preposition you use after "fund". Using "for", "towards", or rephrasing to use "funding" as a gerund are generally safer and more grammatically sound options. Always consider context when choosing a right version between "allocate funds for" and "provide funding for".