fund on

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "fund on" is not a commonly used phrase in written English.
It is not grammatically incorrect, but it may sound awkward or confusing to some readers. One possible use of this phrase could be in a sentence such as "The project was funded on the condition of meeting certain objectives." Here, "funded on" could be interpreted as the project receiving funding based on certain conditions or requirements being met. However, it is more common to use phrases such as "funded by" or "funded through" to indicate the source of funding. Additionally, using the word "condition" may clarify the meaning of the sentence and make it more concise. Overall, it is best to avoid using the phrase "fund on" in written English and instead use more widely accepted phrases.

News & Media

Formal & Business

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

I'm with the Florida fund on this one.

The New York Times

The most obvious one is to establish a standing fund on which relief agencies can draw.

The Economist

He wagered nearly one-third of the firm's $7.7 billion fund on EMI.

The New York Times

Pakistani officials met with the fund on Tuesday in Dubai.

The New York Times

"Pat, I got my daughter's college fund on this game.

The New York Times - Sports

Merkel and Sarkozy ruled out any such fund on Saturday.

The Guardian - Business

"The Fed is acting like a huge hedge fund on our behalf.

The New York Times

"We focus the fund on innovation and therapies that can satisfy unmet medical needs".

The New York Times

Mr. Hands bet about 30 percent of Terra Firma's most recent fund on EMI.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

2 human-written examples

These are additional charges added onto students' tuition to fund on-campus groups and services.

Vice

Tax-deductible contributions may be made this Fund on-line here (http://tinyurl.com/k7qa4wj).

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing financial support, consider using more common and clear alternatives like "funded by" or "funded through" to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "fund on" in formal documents or academic papers. Opt for established alternatives like "funded by" or "financed through" for a more professional tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "fund on" functions primarily as a prepositional phrase, often specifying a condition or basis for funding. However, as Ludwig AI suggests, it's less common and might benefit from clearer alternatives.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

30%

Science

30%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "fund on" isn't strictly grammatically incorrect, Ludwig AI indicates it is a less common expression. It functions as a prepositional phrase, often aiming to specify a condition or basis for funding. Given its limited usage and potential for ambiguity, particularly in formal writing, opting for clearer alternatives like "funded by" or "financed through" is generally recommended. Sources indicate its use in News & Media, Formal & Business, and Scientific contexts, but even there, alternatives are often preferable. The expert rating reflects this, suggesting that while the sources are of reasonable quality, the overall usage consistency and grammatical clarity could be improved.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

fund using

Focuses on the means or method of funding.

provide funding for

Focuses on the act of supplying financial resources.

support financially

Highlights the financial aspect of the support being provided.

finance through

Emphasizes the method or channel used for financing.

capitalize with

Highlights the act of providing capital for a specific purpose.

sponsor through

Implies a form of support, often financial, to enable something.

allocate resources to

Focuses on the distribution of resources toward a particular goal.

invest in

Highlights the act of putting money into something with the expectation of a return.

subsidize via

Suggests providing financial assistance to lower the cost.

endow with

Implies providing a permanent source of income or support.

FAQs

What are some alternatives to "fund on"?

Instead of "fund on", consider using alternatives such as "provide funding for", "finance through", or "invest in" for better clarity.

Is "fund on" grammatically incorrect?

While not strictly incorrect, "fund on" is less common. It's advisable to use more conventional phrases like "funded by" or "based on funding" for clearer communication.

How can I use "provide funding for" in a sentence?

Use "provide funding for" to indicate the act of supplying financial resources: "The government will "provide funding for" the new research project."

What's the difference between "fund on" and "funded by"?

"Fund on" is less common and can sound awkward. "Funded by" is a standard phrase used to specify the source of funding, such as "The project was "funded by" a private donation."