There was a correlation between the cognitive functioning score and the "problem with concentration" score (severity: Pearson r = −0.52, 95% CI: -0.62 to −0.40; interference: Pearson r = −0.47, 95% CI: -0.57 to −0.35).
Seven participants (15%) scored below the recommended cut-point for lower global cognitive functioning (score < 80).
The obese group, but not the overweight group, showed lower physical functioning score compared with the healthy weight group.
However, there were no differences in the mean physical and school functioning score between the male and female adolescents.
There was no significant difference between patients with or without diagnosis on the sum scale of HoNOS score or GAF symptoms and functioning score.
Furthermore, a negative correlation was observed between the baseline physical functioning score and variation of this score between baseline and week 26 (figure 2).
For metastatic patients treated with oxaliplatin-based first line chemotherapy, baseline physical functioning score was independently associated with the OS [ 26].
Given the lower than expected transition rates, our sample used CAARMS criteria with a 30% reduction in global assessment of functioning score for the family history group only; subsequent versions of the CAARMS have applied a 30% reduction in global assessment of functioning score for all groups.
Likewise, only two of seven subcomponents used to calculate the overall cognitive functioning score for the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery increased during the first 6 months of EPICENTER care (i.e., verbal learning and processing speed).
Similarly, "anxiety," "sad or unhappy feelings," and "problems with concentration" were correlated with the emotional functioning score.
A model that included only muscle weakness, pain, and shortness of breath accounted for 21.2% of the variability in the Physical Functioning Score.
