The phrase "functioning of the community" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe the overall operation and effectiveness of a particular community, such as a town, neighborhood, or social group. Example: "The successful functioning of the community relies on active participation from its members and effective communication among its leaders."
Whether a corporation or a municipality owns or possesses the town, the public in either case has an identical interest in the functioning of the community in such manner that the channels of communication remain free.
But those who call him amir offer a much sharper sense of how essential he is to the functioning of the community.
Community mental health refers to the extent to which the organization and functioning of the community determines, or is conducive to, the mental health of its members.
In 2015, a technical paper facilitated by UNISDR suggested amending the definition to read, "a serious disruption of the functioning of the community or society due to hazardous events interacting with conditions of vulnerability and exposure, leading to widespread human, material, economic and environmental losses and impacts" (emphasis added) (UNISDR 2015).
Are residents encouraged to participate in the functioning of the community?
By doing so, the children will remain active participants in the functioning of the community and help in building child friendly municipalities.
Human health should now "be thought of as a collective property of the human-associated microbiota," as one group of researchers recently concluded in a landmark review article on microbial ecology — that is, as a function of the community, not the individual.
In the third case, the institutional power gradually declines, and the power and function of the community culture still exist.
When the two nodes of the edge belong to the same community, but the degrees of the nodes are different from the above situations, the value of the function of the community ratings will decrease.
The first difference emerges just examining the probability distribution function of the community size in Fig. 9. SMS communities are generally smaller than call communities, independently of the detection algorithm.
The OTUs table was normalized by dividing the abundance of each OTU by its predicted 16S copy number, producing the KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes) classified functions of the community by Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt) (Langille et al. 2013).
