From Figure 4f, we can see that the level set function of our model is almost close to a two-valued function (the object is 1 and the background is 0).
Although this is very difficult to achieve, we attempted to determine the possible relationships between the respective mechanisms of the afterslip and viscoelastic relaxations and the exp and log decay functions of our model.
In order to measure the effective discounting function of our model, we modified the adjusting-delay assay of Mazur [39].
Furthermore, we compare the radial distribution function of our model with the existing segments obtained from x-ray diffraction (PDB entries 1gk7 for the 1A segment and 1gk4 for the 2B segment), showing good agreement as depicted in Fig. S5.
We validated the function of our model by measuring the accuracy of the model for the prediction of gene knockout essentiality.
The following model specifies the likelihood function of our model by describing the relation between genotype i and the pair of haplotypes (H im, H if ): (2) Parameter q is an error rate between genotype i and pair of haplotypes (H im, H if ) '. Indicator I(g il == h iml + h ifl ) has value 1 when the two alleles at locus l match with the genotype on locus l and 0otherwisee.
The partial pair distribution function, g(r), of our model.
A complete description of the experimental results, novel protein function discoveries, and design of our model are given in the sections below.
The second point, however, required a generalization of the Boolean model by introducing multi-level logical functions at various points of our model.
In particular, our results suggest the existence of a UV dose threshold for the proper functioning of our PRR model in response to UV-induced damages, corroborated by a fine concordance of the balance of mono- and poly-ubiquitylated PCNA isoforms between wet measurements and simulation outcomes at UV doses below 30 J/m.
