functionally superfluous

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "functionally superfluous" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that serves no practical purpose or is unnecessary in a given context. Example: "The additional features in the software update were deemed functionally superfluous, as they did not enhance user experience."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

(John Maynard Smith, in noting that sentience is in theory functionally superfluous, is one of the few prominent Darwinians to have acknowledged the depth of the mystery).

The New York Times - Books

This may help to explain why written English has not evolved an orthographic system to represent intonation and the tonic foot; they are functionally superfluous.

Functional Linguistics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

The list of "considered functionals" is superfluous.

Biology Direct

Superfluous, indeed.

The New York Times - Arts

Superfluous man.

The New York Times

You eliminate the superfluous.

The New York Times

That would be superfluous.

The New Yorker

The iPad was superfluous.

The New York Times - Tech

Are they superfluous?

The New York Times

Many scenes are superfluous.

The New Yorker

The applause seems superfluous".

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "functionally superfluous" when you want to emphasize that something is unnecessary from a practical or operational standpoint, even if it might exist in theory.

Common error

Avoid using "functionally superfluous" in casual conversation or informal writing; it's better suited for technical or academic discussions where precision is valued.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "functionally superfluous" serves as an adjective phrase that modifies a noun, indicating that the noun is unnecessary or redundant in terms of its practical application. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "functionally superfluous" is a grammatically correct and usable adjective phrase that describes something as unnecessary from a practical standpoint. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and suggests it's best suited for formal contexts like scientific or technical writing. While the phrase isn't frequently used, understanding its precise meaning and appropriate context can enhance clarity in professional communication. Related alternatives include "practically unnecessary" and "operationally redundant".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

practically unnecessary

Focuses on the practical aspect of being unnecessary.

operationally redundant

Highlights the redundancy in operational terms.

effectively redundant

Emphasizes the actual effect of being redundant.

superfluous in practice

Inverts the structure while retaining the meaning.

unnecessary in function

Focuses on the functional aspect of being unnecessary.

serving no practical purpose

Explains the redundancy by stating the absence of a practical role.

extraneous in application

Highlights the extraneous nature in terms of application.

effectively unneeded

Simple and direct alternative, emphasizing the lack of need.

not required in practice

Focuses on the practical requirement.

unessential in operation

Highlights the unessential nature in operational terms.

FAQs

How to use "functionally superfluous" in a sentence?

You can use "functionally superfluous" to describe something that serves no practical purpose or is unnecessary in a given context. For instance: "The additional features in the software update were deemed "functionally superfluous", as they did not enhance user experience."

What can I say instead of "functionally superfluous"?

You can use alternatives like "practically unnecessary" or "operationally redundant" depending on the context.

Is "functionally superfluous" formal or informal?

"Functionally superfluous" leans towards the formal side, making it suitable for technical, academic, or professional settings. In casual conversations, simpler terms like "unnecessary" or "redundant" might be more appropriate.

What's the difference between "functionally superfluous" and "simply superfluous"?

"Functionally superfluous" specifically implies that something is unnecessary in terms of its practical function or operation. "Simply superfluous", on the other hand, means it's generally excessive or extra without necessarily specifying a functional context.