Sentence examples for functional difficulty of from inspiring English sources

Fourth, any attempt to equate "functional difficulty" of an ongoing task is likely to have limited ecological validity and real-life relevance.

Einstein and McDaniel [11] explained that they made their ongoing task easier for older vs. younger adults because "this [making word lists shorter for older vs. younger adults] equated functional difficulty" of the ongoing task.

One might argue that Einstein and McDaniel [4] and others who incorporated the ease of ongoing task confound into their designs aimed to equate functional difficulty of ongoing tasks for younger and older adults and that age declines under these "functionally equated" conditions reflect true age differences in prospective memory.

This randomised trial will investigate the clinical effectiveness of a discharge planning program in reducing functional difficulties of older adults post-discharge.

For example, the highest item response category on the functional difficulty scale of the OA-FUNCTION-CAT was slightly over 80, whereas the WOMAC was limited to a little over 70 as its highest item response category expected score.

HAQ-DI scores of 0 to 1 generally represent mild to moderate functional difficulty, scores of 1 to 2 represent moderate to severe functional difficulty, and scores of 2 to 3 indicate severe to very severe limitations of physical function or disability [ 27].

They found that many FIM and MDS items cluster around the centre of the functional difficulty range, the range of content coverage was wider for the MDS than the FIM, and the MDS measures functional ability most precisely at the low end of the dimension whereas the FIM is more precise in the low to moderate dimension [ 16].

For the functional difficulty scale, 95% of the sample scores achieved reliability estimates greater than 0.97 for the OA-FUNCTION-CAT compared with 0.76 for the WOMAC.

Measures of functional difficulty and pain were the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) and Numeric Pain Scale (NPS).

Scores from each activity are summed to give an overall indication of functional difficulty, where 0 indicates maximal difficulty and 80 indicates no difficulty.

The full 125-item banks calibrated well with a uni-dimensional IRT model, providing greater breadth and more precise, more accurate, and more reliable estimates of functional difficulty and functional pain than the WOMAC.