Scores are classified as: normal cognitive function with a score of 27 30; mild cognitive impairment with a score of 21 26; moderate cognitive impairment with a score of 11 20; and severe cognitive impairment with a score of 0 10 [ 24].
A three point change in raw scores can represent a change in cognitive abilities ranging from 0.85 standard deviations of cognitive functioning (representing a change from a score of 4 to 1) to 0.14 standard deviations of cognitive functioning (from a score of 37 to 34).
The main purpose of a scoring function though is to rank binding poses, and here the MOE scoring functions are effective.
The score could also be expressed as a percentage of normal shoulder function, where a score of 2100 reflected 0% of normal function and a score of 0 reflected 100% [ 24].
Accordingly, we plotted the levels of TNF, IL-6, IL-10, and NO2-/NO3 as a function of Marshall Score, an index of organ failure, calculated at each blood sampling time point (Fig. 2).
As the fragment sizes diverge in size, the scoring function awards less of a score.
A score of 6 indicates full function, and a score of 5 or lower indicates any physical impairment.
These continuous variables comprise six domains; a score of 0 represents normal function, and a score of 4 reflects marked physiologic derangement.
The OQLQ uses a 7-point scale with a score of 1 representing the worst possible function, and a score of 7 representing the best possible function.
Therefore, the fitness function can be represented as an increasing function of a protein alignment score.
In case of loss-of-function URAT1 polymorphism, a score of 3 was assigned to those homozygous for the reference allele, 2 to heterozygotes, and 1 to those homozygous for the loss-of-function allele.
