fuller reviewed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "fuller reviewed" is not correct in standard written English.
It seems to be an attempt to convey a more thorough or comprehensive review, but it lacks clarity and proper grammatical structure. Example: "The report was fuller reviewed than the previous version, providing more insights and details."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Schneider and Pichora-Fuller reviewed several of the competing theories about the association between sensory and cognitive decline and labeled them as follows: (1) the sensory deprivation hypothesis, (2) the information degradation hypothesis, (3) the cognitive-load-on-perception hypothesis, and (4) the common-cause hypothesis.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics

– confessionsofabooklover, teen reviewer Read the full review.

The Guardian - Books

Read full review here.

The New York Times

Read the full review here.

The New York Times

(The full review is classified).

The Economist

– Salley Vickers Read the full review.

The Guardian - Books

Sarah Perry Read the full review.

The Guardian - Books

Read a full review.

The Guardian - Music

– Anita Sethi Read the full review.

The Guardian - Books

Read the full review Cumberbatch?

The Guardian

A full review follows shortly.

The Guardian - Music

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Instead of using "fuller reviewed", opt for phrases like "more thoroughly reviewed" or "more comprehensively reviewed" to ensure grammatical correctness and clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "fuller" as an adverbial modifier for "reviewed". The correct way to express a more detailed review is by using adverbs like "thoroughly" or "comprehensively".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "fuller reviewed" attempts to function as an adjective modifying a past participle, describing the extent of a review. However, Ludwig AI indicates that this usage is not correct in standard written English.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "fuller reviewed" is grammatically incorrect and not recognized in standard English writing. As Ludwig AI indicates, it's best to avoid this phrase. Instead, opt for alternatives like "more thoroughly reviewed" or "more comprehensively reviewed" to accurately convey a more detailed or extensive review process. These alternatives ensure clarity and adhere to grammatical conventions, making your writing more professional and easily understood. Due to the lack of usage examples, it is impossible to recommend this expression in any context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

more thoroughly reviewed

Emphasizes the depth and detail of the review process.

more comprehensively reviewed

Highlights the breadth and scope of the review.

reviewed in greater detail

Focuses on the level of detail considered during the review.

subjected to a more complete review

Suggests a more exhaustive and all-encompassing review process.

more extensively reviewed

Implies a wider range and coverage in the review.

carefully reviewed

Highlights the attention and diligence applied during the review.

closely examined

Focuses on the meticulous nature of the review.

more critically reviewed

Emphasizes the analytical and evaluative aspect of the review.

more deeply analyzed

Highlights the in-depth analysis conducted during the review.

reviewed in full

Indicates that the review was performed completely, without omissions.

FAQs

What are some alternatives to "fuller reviewed"?

Since "fuller reviewed" is not grammatically correct, you can use alternatives like "more thoroughly reviewed", "more comprehensively reviewed", or "reviewed in greater detail".

Is "fuller reviewed" grammatically correct?

No, "fuller reviewed" is not grammatically correct in standard English. It's better to use phrases like "more thoroughly reviewed" or "more comprehensively reviewed".

How can I express that something was reviewed in more detail?

You can use phrases like "reviewed in greater detail", "more extensively reviewed", or "more deeply analyzed".

What is the difference between "thoroughly reviewed" and "comprehensively reviewed"?

"Thoroughly reviewed" implies a deep and detailed examination, while "comprehensively reviewed" suggests a wide-ranging and all-encompassing assessment. They are both better choices than "fuller reviewed".