Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(26)
Examination of abstracts identified that 55 full text publications warranted detailed examination.
Full text publications were obtained and reviewed.
Potentially relevant full text publications were reviewed in detail.
We identified 40 potentially relevant full text publications.
After removal of duplicates, full text publications of the remainder (n = 58) were retrieved and evaluated.
771 citations were identified; 37 full text publications met inclusion criteria and were assessed.
Similar(34)
We excluded reviews, editorials, commentaries, and practice guidelines, as well as conference abstracts and other non-full text publications.
First, we focused on the five full-text publications.
Full-text publications written in English or in German were included.
The other full-text publications were not included because they did not contain comprehensive cost or cost-effectiveness data.
Full-text publications in English language were considered.
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com