Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(6)
The objective of this study was to evaluate neonatal morbidities among early term births and full term births in a tertiary care referral center.
For full term births, the date of conception was computed by subtracting 177 days from the date of birth [14], [15].
The variables representing parity (number of full term births) and different birth characteristics were treated as time-dependent categorical variables.
Of the 634,844 live full term births included in our analyses, 49.36% of the births were male, 71.70% were white, only 7.50% had maternal age below 20 and 21.16% of the mothers had more than 15 years of education.
One study 2 of the five did conduct an analysis restricted to full term births (≥37 weeks) and found results similar to those when they had restricted births to greater than 34 weeks' gestation.
To identify and measure the significance of factors affecting birth weight two models were performed: a linear mixed regression models using birth weight (among full term births) as the outcome and a logistic mixed regression models using pre term/full term birth as the outcome [ 9, 28].
Similar(54)
To determine neonatal morbidity rates for early term birth compared with full term birth by precursor leading to delivery.
Studies of early term birth after demonstrated fetal lung maturity show that respiratory and other outcomes are worse with early term birth (370-386) even after demonstrated fetal lung maturity when compared with full term birth (390-406).
Inclusion criteria were: healthy, full term birth, no craniofacial anomalies and no known immune deficits.
The infant subjects were born at gestational ages representing the full spectrum of early preterm to full term birth (24 40 weeks).
As we did not collect data on full term or preterm birth in men, in our main analysis we included all participants on the basis of their birthweight category regardless of whether they were preterm or full term birth.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com