full rights

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "full rights" is correct and commonly used in written English.
It means having all the privileges, powers, and freedoms that are granted to someone or a group of people. Example: "Citizens of this country have full rights to free speech, assembly, and religion as guaranteed by the Constitution."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Women should have full rights.

The Economist

May you enjoy everywhere the full rights of free citizens.

The New Yorker

"You have full rights in this new South Africa.

The Guardian - Books

Easter Island natives are Chilean citizens who enjoy full rights without any limitations.

The New York Times

(By contrast, newspapers typically own the full rights to articles published by their employees).

The New York Times

It could, some suggest, be extended to have the full rights of marriage.

The New York Times

Shareholders and the workforce were being hoodwinked, or at best denied their full rights.

The Economist

Full rights, including marriage, for gays and lesbians are swiftly becoming the status quo.

The New York Times

"We will defend ourselves, and we have full rights to do so.

The New York Times

They want their full rights, and they want life, a dignified life".

The New York Times

"We are prepared to put resources into informing parents and students of their full rights.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing legal or civic matters, use "full rights" to clearly communicate the complete scope of entitlements. For example, "All citizens should have the full rights guaranteed by the constitution."

Common error

Be precise when using "full rights". Ensure the context accurately reflects that all possible rights are indeed included, and avoid using it in situations where certain limitations or exceptions may apply.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "full rights" functions primarily as a noun phrase. It typically acts as the object of a verb or the complement of a preposition, denoting the complete set of entitlements, privileges, or freedoms afforded to an individual or group. As Ludwig AI confirms, its usage is widespread and grammatically sound.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

68%

Science

15%

Wiki

9%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "full rights" is a common and grammatically correct noun phrase that refers to the complete set of entitlements, privileges, and freedoms granted to an individual or group. As Ludwig AI highlights, its use is widespread across various contexts, particularly in news and media, science, and encyclopedias. When using "full rights", it's important to ensure the context accurately reflects that all possible rights are included to avoid overstatements. Alternatives like "complete rights", "unrestricted rights", and "absolute rights" can be used to add nuance or emphasis. Overall, understanding the concept of "full rights" is essential for clear and accurate communication, particularly when discussing legal, social, and political issues.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

all rights

A more succinct way of saying every right is included.

complete rights

Emphasizes the completeness and totality of the rights.

unrestricted rights

Focuses on the absence of limitations or restrictions on the rights.

complete legal rights

Combination of legal aspect and completeness.

absolute rights

Highlights the unconditional and non-negotiable nature of the rights.

full legal entitlements

Combination of legal aspect and full extent.

comprehensive rights

Stresses the breadth and inclusiveness of the rights.

unqualified rights

Indicates rights that are not subject to any qualifications or conditions.

entire rights

Underscores the completeness and wholeness of the rights.

legal entitlements

Specifies the legal basis of the rights, emphasizing their legitimacy.

FAQs

What does it mean to have "full rights"?

Having "full rights" means possessing all the legal, social, and political entitlements, privileges, and protections afforded to individuals within a specific context, such as citizenship or contractual agreements.

How do "full rights" differ from partial rights?

"Full rights" indicate complete and unrestricted entitlements, whereas partial rights imply that some limitations or conditions apply. For example, a permanent resident may have some rights of a citizen but not "full citizenship".

What are examples of situations where people might not have "full rights"?

Situations where people might not have "full rights" include being a minor, a non-citizen, or having a criminal record that restricts certain freedoms. Also, in some contexts, individuals may be denied "full protections" under the law due to discrimination or systemic inequality.

Is "full rights" the same as "human rights"?

While related, they aren't identical. "Human rights" are fundamental rights inherent to all individuals, regardless of citizenship or status. "Full rights", on the other hand, often refers to the complete set of entitlements within a specific legal or social system, which can vary. Human rights should be universally applied, whereas "legal entitlements" depend on the law.