Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(8)
Descriptive data obtained from the MacTSQ baseline dataset of the IVAN trial indicated that the full range of response options was used for seven of the 15 items (Table 1).
Subjects used the full range of response options for each of the items, with the exception of the item concerning number of bowel movements; no study participants reported > 24 bowel movements for the single-day scores selected at random.
The full range of response options was used for seven items, the three most extreme levels of dissatisfaction (scores of 0 – 2) were not used in four items and the two most extreme indications of dissatisfaction (scores of 0-1) were not used in four items.
Other questions appropriately included the full range of response options.
The full range of response options were used for every item.
Participants used the full range of response options on the 5-point scale for all except three items.
Similar(52)
Responses for all items covered the full range of answer options (see Table 2).
Table 2 demonstrates that all items of the HABC-Monitor tool exhibited the full range of response categories across the four item response options.
All items reported by patients on the Self-Report Version exhibited the full range of response categories across the four item response options, as demonstrated in Table 1.
Above all, there was no ceiling effect or floor effect since participants tended to use the full range of the response options.
Table 1 Range of response options used at time 1 and mean scores for each item.
More suggestions(17)
whole range of response options
full range of intervention options
full range of funding options
full range of braiding options
full range of career options
full list of response options
full spectrum of response options
full set of response options
full benefit of response options
full evaluation of response options
full panoply of response options
full range of family options
full palette of response options
full load of response options
full discussion of response options
full range of response levels
full array of response options
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com