Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
Table 2 demonstrates that all items of the HABC-Monitor tool exhibited the full range of response categories across the four item response options.
All items reported by patients on the Self-Report Version exhibited the full range of response categories across the four item response options, as demonstrated in Table 1.
Similar(58)
Other health professionals who responded were GPs, counsellors, psychological therapists, and a consultant psychiatrist (Table 1).> A full range of responses (categories one through to five) was evident for all 30 items in the testing version of the R-DAQ.
Other questions appropriately included the full range of response options.
The full range of response options were used for every item.
The range of responses was examined to ascertain the need for the full range of response options and the 'not applicable' options.
Participants used the full range of response options on the 5-point scale for all except three items.
The full range of responses to each item was observed (Additional file 1: Table S1).
The selected sample represented the full range of responses to the two identified survey questions.
The full range of responses was observed on each scale item (Table 3), although responses were skewed towards higher values.
Patients used the full range of responses for each AIA item, with the median response for each item being 2.0 ('some of the time') (Table 1).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com