As mentioned above, Tier II had the lowest full completion rates compared to other Tiers but rates differed between cohorts with older adults having a much higher full data completion rate (63% vs. 29%).
Weights w n, n ∈ N, are fixed at 1. Figure 8b shows the distribution of the normalized data rates (w.r.t. the full-power data rate Rn,ofor each user n) and normalized transmit powers (w.r.t. the full-power Pn,totbudget of each user n) across the two users for the scenario of Figure 5a for the different greening policies when 50% greening is applied, i.e., ∑ n P n /∑ n Pn, tot= 0.5.
Tier III had full data completion rates (4 visits over 16 months), of 90%and76%6% for northern and central California participants, respectively, nearly as high as Tier I first year data collection.
Even stronger, for 20% power usage, one can still transmit at 80% of the full-power data rate performance.
It can be seen that Greening 4A is the best in terms of rate sum performance, i.e., 50% of system transmit power is saved while still achieving 93% of full-power data rate performance.
For instance, we have demonstrated that for some VDSL scenarios transmit power savings of up to 50% can be achieved while preserving 95% of full-power data rate performance.
Table 2 summarises to whom requests were made, the number of requests made, number of responses with full data, the calculated response rate and the actual amount of data obtained.
In branch-site analyses of Data Set 1 (the full data set), comparison of the evolutionary rates between the bear clade and the clade composed of all the other carnivores suggested that 8 of 13 genes have significantly accelerated rates of evolution in bears (P ≤ 0.01) (supplementary fig. S2, Supplementary Material online).
As expected, NF-full achieves the best data rate performance for the macro victim users, followed closely by NF-IWF and NF-IWF-approx.
However the final participation rate with full data was only 47%.
