Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Ten random chips are available when the bar is full; a total of twenty can be used for each level excursion.
Similar(59)
Boston Red Sox (Share of Players' Pool: $31,747,908.06; value of each of full share: $416,837.72) – The Red Sox issued 66 full shares, a total of 10.025 partial shares and eight cash awards.
Los Angeles Dodgers (Share of Players' Pool: $21,165,272.04; value of each of full share: $262,027.49) – The Dodgers issued 67 full shares, a total of 13.290 partial shares and 24 cash awards.
Houston Astros (Share of Players' Pool: $10,582,636.02; value of each of full share: $154,656.05) – The Astros issued 56 full shares, a total of 12.220 partial shares and five cash awards.
Milwaukee Brewers (Share of Players' Pool: $10,582,636.02; value of each of full share: $122,957.13) – The Brewers issued 64 full shares, a total of 21.051 partial shares and four cash awards.
New York Yankees (Share of Players' Pool: $2,866,130.59; value of each of full share: $43,081.55) – The Yankees issued 45 full shares, a total of 21.470 partial shares and two cash awards.
Cleveland Indians (Share of Players' Pool: $2,866,130.59; value of each of full share: $37,040.29) – The Indians issued 67 full shares, a total of 8.570 partial shares and 10 cash awards.
Colorado Rockies (Share of Players' Pool: $2,866,130.59; value of each of full share: $40,335.96) – The Rockies issued 58 full shares, a total of 12.833 partial shares and seven cash awards.
Atlanta Braves (Share of Players' Pool: $2,866,130.59; value of each of full share: $40,375.74) – The Braves issued 65 full shares, a total of 5.875 partial shares and seven cash awards.
Oakland Athletics (Share of Players' Pool: $1,322,829.50; value of each of full share: $19,760.35) – The A's issued 57 full shares, a total of 9.083 partial shares and 15 cash awards.
The average of all corresponding patch images from the full dataset – a total of 10821 images - is shown in frame (c).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com