Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Dsypnoea (mMRC ≥ Grade 2) and wheezing (ever or on most days/nights) were more common among biomass users compared to those who used non-biomass fuel (p <0.001), with age-adjusted prevalence of dyspnoea being 17.8%95%5% CI 14.1, 21.5%) among female and 12.0% (8.9, 15.1%) among male biomass fuel users, compared to 7.6% (5.1, 10.1%) and 2.5% (1.0, 4.1%) among cleaner fuel users.
Similar(59)
Neither the proportion of LBW infants nor the proportion of SGA infants varied significantly by fuel type (p = 0.09 and p = 0.75 respectively).
where d is the average annual travel distance, e − 1 is liters of gasoline per kilometer (i.e., reciprocal of fuel mileage), p g is the gasoline price, and p s = e − 1 × p g represents the gasoline price per kilometer (i.e., energy service price).
Final Report of United States Fuel Administrator, p. 20; Report of Engineers Committee, 1918, 1919, p. 1.
The Plant-Microbial Fuel Cell (P-MFC) is in theory a technology that could produce sustainable electricity continuously.
In external glucose fuel cells, Pd, Ni and other transition metals are good catalysts for glucose oxidation in alkaline medium, even better than Pt is.
Based on the observed transport properties, the superiority of LWO67 applied to a proton-conducting solid electrolyte fuel cells (p-ITFCs) was also discussed.
The Plant-Microbial Fuel Cell (P-MFC) is a technology that could produce sustainable bio-electricity and help meeting the increasing energy demand.
In search for renewable and sustainable bio-energy production, Strik et al. (2008) presented the plant microbial fuel cell (P-MFC).
The Plant-Microbial Fuel Cell (P-MFC) is a technology that can potentially be used weather-independent, at any place in the world where plants can grow, without competition with food or feed production, and with relatively low investment costs [ 6- 11].
Model fitting yielded three significant predictors of benzene exposure, namely, fuel octane grade (p = 0.0011), duration of exposure (p = 0.0054), and season of the year (p = 0.032).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com