Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(8)
On its last turn the banner appeared to get tangled in the tail fin and the aircraft – 10 metres (30 ft) up – turned over and plunged into the ground.
Varying in size between 50 and 150 sqm (538 to 1,614 sq ft), up to 350 of these could fit into the Estadio Nacional leaving plenty of seats for those attending games and other events.
The "8 ft up and go test" involves standing up from a chair, walking 8 ft to and around a cone, and returning to the chair in the shortest possible time [ 41].
They climbed 80 ft up one of the rig's legs despite the crew using water cannons to repel them.
When my husband and I went on our first rappelling trip, I was instructed on the techniques for gradually rappelling without having to plunge into the water from the precipice 110 ft up.
The ladder reaches 20 meters (65.6 ft) up the wall of the building.
Similar(52)
ANCOVA also showed a significant declining performance in the 30-second chair stand, arm curl, back scratch, 8-ft up-and-go, and 6-minute walk between pre- and posttests for all DC groups (P<0.001 for all).
At baseline, significant differences were identified between all IL groups and DC groups in the 30-second chair stand, arm curl, back scratch, 8-ft up-and-go, and 6-minute walk (P<0.001 for all).
The items were evaluated using the following tests: 30-second chair stand (repetitions), arm curl (repetitions), chair sit-and-reach (centimeters), back scratch (centimeters), 8-ft up-and-go (seconds), and 6-minute walk (meters), always in this order.
ANCOVA with baseline as covariate identified significant and positive improvements in the 30-second chair stand, arm curl, back scratch, 8-ft up-and-go, and 6-minute walk between pre- and posttests in all IL groups (P<0.001 for all).
12, 13, 29 In addition, in the performance of the 8-ft up-and-go, which is a demonstration of agility but is highly dependent on the mechanical power developed by the lower limbs, 21 significant differences were identified after the multimodal training.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com