Sentence examples for fs from inspiring English sources

In all the big democracies (as well as elsewhere) the three Fs have played their part in creating a mood of dissatisfaction.

Hence the logical form of a statement of a simple law is not 'All Fs are Gs'; in the case of a law involving two first-order properties, it is a second-order atomic sentence of the form 'N F,G)' (see, e.g., Armstrong 1978a; 1983; Dretske 1977; Tooley 1977).

When it comes to the Liar, Barwise and Etchemendy construe Liar propositions as having the form fs = {s; [Tr,fs; 0]}, relative to an initial situation s.

The important difference between the rigid and the generic cases is that (EDR) refers to a specific object whereas (EDG) only requires that at least some Fs exist.

In the Fichte Studies he polemically asks whether Fichte has not "too arbitrarily packed everything into the I" (FS #5).

An articulation will specify both actual conditions which must be met for something to be (an) F, and identity conditions for tracing Fs through space, time, and possible worlds.

The domain-conditions reading is just the familiar reading we know from first order semantics: 'there are Fs' is true iff there exists an entity in the relevant real domain which satisfies 'F'.

But propositions cannot be both Fs and these new entities, because these new entities are not Fs.

Third, in his distinction between negative and infinite judgments he apparently needlessly distinguishes between a "wide scope" negation of whole propositions and a "narrow scope" negation of predicates, thus creating a systematic ambiguity in interpreting propositions of the form "Fs are not Gs," which can then be construed either as "no Fs are Gs" or as "Fs are non-Gs".

In particular, the state of affairs ⟨Tr,fs; 0⟩ cannot be in s. (Actually, Barwise and Etchemendy say that the proposition is expressible, but give up on what they call the F-closure of s. But there is a core observation in common between these two points, and the details do not matter for our purposes here).

IL&FS Skills, an Indian training company, gives students a guarantee of a job if they finish its courses.Better vocational education is hardly a cure-all for the global jobs crisis: millions of young people will be condemned to unemployment so long as demand remains slack and growth sluggish.