Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
There are several possible explanations for this difference in expression levels between the two systems: it may reflect an intrinsic higher level of expression from the replicating versus the non-replicating system or it may relate to the strain of A. tumefaciens (GV3101 vs LBA4404) used for infiltration.
Similar(59)
A 4% OLS slope difference (0.88 and 0.92) was found from the replicated Rn sampling (i.e., spatial variability).
Confidence interval for a given LS score is also found by bootstrapping from the replicated data.
Results from the replicated microarray experiments showed high levels of consistence with minimum variations within each treatment.
Data represented in figures include standard deviations from the replicates.
This hypothesis has been validated by data obtained from the replicate experiments.
At each site, soil from the replicate cores was mixed to constitute a composite sample.
Values are mean and standard deviation (SD) obtained from the replicates, with the latter shown in parentheses.
The experimental error (1.98%, 1.90%, and 2.38% for AB1, AY19, and AO7 respectively) due to uncontrolled factors was calculated from the replicates of the center point.
Data from the replicates were very consistent.
Offspring from the replicates were pooled for χ2 analysis.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com