Your English writing platform
Free sign upExact(60)
From the proof of Step 2, (3.28).
⇔ (from the proof of Theorem 3.1).
Hence, most data was acquired from the proof run.
It follows from the proof of Lemma 2.7 that (233).
Moreover, from the proof of the same theorem,.
Equation (3.10) follows from the proof of Corollary 3.1 immediately.
From the proof of (i), we have that (3.13) .
From the proof of Lemma 2.10, U is bounded below.
From the proof of Theorem 3.4, we know that (3.9).
Then from the proof of Lemma 2.5 we have (cTpsigeqpsi).
From the proof of Theorem 2.1, we obtain (LVleq M).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com