Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
It follows from the first relation of (7) that | a j β | < 1, 1 ≤ j ≤ k + 1.
Similar(57)
Remark 3.1 H = ( H 00 J ∗ = ( H 0 J ∗ follows from (3.3) and the first relation of (3.8) in the special case that a = − ∞ and b = + ∞.
The first relation immediately follows from (10.1) with Definition 8.1.
From the second relation in, we obtain that (3.17).
From the second relation, as before, we get, for each, that, for each and hence, as.
From the second relation in (8), it is seen that the step-size for each node is independent of the data received from other nodes.
and hence, since is bounded in and converges pointwise in to the trivial function, we deduce, from the second relation in(2.23) and(2.24), that which contradicts the first relation in(2.23).
If the first relation (the relation 'outgoing' from the child HOG, 'A' in the previous example) and the last relation (the relation 'incoming' to the parent HOG, 'B' in the previous example) are of the same type (e.g. part_of, is_a ), then the putative relationship is defined as this type.
So, the first relation of (3.4) holds.
It follows from (8) and the second relation of condition (7) that all the eigenvalues of D F ( O ) have absolute values larger than 1 in norm.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com