Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
Exact(1)
One individual was excluded from the analysis because of unknown ART start date.
Similar(59)
In this study, 5.7% of women known to have been diagnosed with a second tumour were excluded from the incidence risk analysis because of unknown diagnosis.
The X and Y chromosomes were excluded from the analysis because the genders of the individual cord blood samples were unknown.
Transfers from GP or non-governmental programmes (n = 8) were included for TB prevalence analysis but removed before incidence and survival analysis because of unknown previous ART regimens.
Third, our study might have been biased because many children were excluded from the analysis because they did not have their vaccination cards available and/or had unknown vaccination status and this percentage varied between cases and controls.
Twenty four patients were excluded from the analysis due to unknown gender and 1,691 patients were excluded from the analysis because they were not observed in the database at least three months before the index date and either at least 3 months after the index date or with a record of death, reducing our confidence of complete data capture.
Of these, five were excluded from the analysis due to unknown illness status or because the criteria for our case definition were not fulfilled.
Of the 1,746 MTBC isolates we genotyped initially, we excluded 533 (31%) for this part of the analysis because they lacked patient information or were of unknown lineage.
The dosage of the last recorded prescription was not included in the analysis because the length of time for which it was used is unknown.
The majority of the genes identified from this network analysis were of unknown function.
Clinicopathological and immunohistochemical data were available for the entire cohort; however, five patients have been excluded from the survival analysis because survival times were unknown.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com