This study follows [4,6] approach to shift the focus from outcome to the value co-creation process itself.
The emergence of this two-process architecture in childhood suggests that the developmental shift from outcome- to intent-based judgment involves a conceptual reorganization within the moral domain.
This also means that we use the burn-in period to identify the parameter values of iterations before a chain converges to a constant mean and to exclude them from outcome analysis (King 2012).
Therefore, data to support either position contemporarily are elusive and unfounded, except for information gleaned from outcome studies that take into account all phases of the root canal procedures.
Results from outcome studies may be subject to bias, depending on the setting (community versus clinic), design (retrospective versus prospective) and characteristics of the patient cohort studied (age, types of epilepsy, specific comorbidities).
While the designed therapy is already technically feasible today, a positive result from outcome studies will be needed to bring about the political and economic decisions required to change conventional dialysis into a treatment approaching true renal blood purification.
