To begin with, we will review knowledge produced from the implementation analysis (Component A) and the effects analysis (Component B) to understand how (1) the implementation process and (2) the individual characteristics of the sites influenced the observed effects.
Three general observations emerged from our implementation analysis regarding the patient care models implemented.
The data from our implementation analysis coincide with findings from experiences in other provinces and countries showing that some NPs are not able to fully exploit their roles due to issues related to drug prescribing, diagnostic testing, and receiving consultation reports from specialist physicians [ 8, 21, 51, 86, 95, 96].
As described in the Methodology section above, unless otherwise specified, the findings provided here come from the integration of evidence from the logic analysis and implementation analysis components of the study and are structured around the five themes identified.
Ultimately, the evidence from the logic analysis and the implementation analysis was integrated into one single theme-based narrative, and the specific expertise of each team member was mobilized in that process.
Detailed analysis of requirements from an implementation perspective can be useful in helping define sub-requirements to the point where they are implementable.
According to the results obtained from simultaneous implementation of analysis of variance (ANOVA) and mean effect assessment, the formulations designed based on the optimized coupling of stabilizer into organoclay/compatibilizer system exhibited the highest tensile properties among the prepared samples.
Furthermore, results from the implementation complexity analysis demonstrate that with the aid of agent technology, ALBR has lower on-board computation, storage, signaling requirements than other on-board routing schemes.
To estimate the per capita costs of intervention, we used data from a cost analysis of the implementation of MOB/VLL in South Florida (Page et al. 2012).
