Sentence examples for fringe distances from inspiring English sources

Exact(2)

The fringe distances and directions result from the different angles in the alignments with no effect to the fringe visibility.

The zones 1, 2, and 3 exhibit fringe distances around 0.34 nm, which are attributed to the (111) lattice planes of cubic PbS (d 111 = 0.343 nm, JCPDS card, reference code 03-065-0692 03-065-0692 03-065-0692

Similar(58)

This fringe distance conforms to (110) of tungsten, as indicated in JCPDS card no.

The lattice-fringe distances observed from the enlarged HRTEM images of Fig. 2 and Additional file 1: Figure S1 also suggest that the structural details of host CdS QDs have hardly been modified by the incorporation of 2% Cu ions.

Figure 3c shows the lattice fringes with an inter-fringe distance of 0.45 and 0.33 nm, corresponding to (200) of NMO and (004) of CNT, respectively.

The measured inter-fringe distance is 0.232 and 0.230 nm, respectively, being close to the {111} lattice spacing of fcc FePt (~0.235 nm).

Shown in Figure 2 is the high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) image of the FePt nanocubes; the inter-fringe distance of the lattice fringes is measured to be 0.196 nm, being close to the lattice spacing of the (200) facet of the face-centered cubic (fcc) FePt alloy.

The observed lattice-fringe distance in Fig. 2b is 0.336 nm, which agrees well with the standard spacing of 0.336 nm between the adjacent (111) lattice planes of the cubic zinc-blende crystal of CdS. Figure 2c and Table 1 indicate that the average value of the major and the minor axes calculated from HRTEM images of the e-Cu CdS QDs is 2.6 ± 0.4 nm.

It is revealed that both the fringe tortuosity and separation distance decrease as combustion proceeds, while the mean fringe length increases distinctly from 1.00 to 2.13 nm, indicating the soot evolution toward a more graphitic structure during the combustion process.

The degree of disorder of graphene layers (RS analysis bands), fringe interspace distance (∼1.5 nm with XRD, and ∼0.46 nm with HRTEM), fringe length (∼2.5 4 nm with XRD, and ∼0.9 nm with HRTEM), median fringe tortuosity (∼1.1), mean primary particles diameter (∼25 nm), and fractal dimension (∼2.3) were similar for all soot samples.

(26.2 mm) with a maximum fringe field distance of 0.065 in.

Show more...

Ludwig, your English writing platform

Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.

Student

Used by millions of students, scientific researchers, professional translators and editors from all over the world!

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

Get started for free

Unlock your writing potential with Ludwig

Letters

Most frequent sentences: