Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
Static and kinetic friction coefficients (μstatic,Neq, <μkinetic,Neq>) were measured using a previously characterized cartilage-cartilage boundary mode friction test for the following concentrations of purified PRG4 and HA: Test 1: HA (1.5 MDa, 3.3 mg/mL) + PRG4 from 4.5 – 1500 μg/mL; Test 2: PRG4 (450, 150, 45 μg/mL) + HA (1.5 MDa) from 0.3 – 3.3 mg/mL.
This experimental study quantified the tool part interaction by measuring the static and dynamic frictional coefficients as a function of process time, using a friction test fixture specially designed to simulate the autoclave environment.
(a) A group of MoS2 nano-onions before friction test.
Friction coefficient was obtained from drawbead friction test.
The following experiments were performed: polarisation curves, polarisation curves during rubbing, friction test, friction test at an applied electrochemical potential.
Friction test on a single MoS2 nano-onion revealed a combined gliding-rolling process.
Figure 3c, d shows the same nanotube before and after the first friction test.
Figure 5 Details of wear scar after friction test for samples with flat and grooved surfaces.
Results of friction test show that friction properties vary with pitch and depth of grooves.
The tip shape was therefore regularly reconstructed using the Scanning Probe Image Processor (SPIP) before and after each friction test.
Permeability values in both gouges were reduced by about an order of magnitude after the friction test.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com