Sentence examples for frequency statements from inspiring English sources

We found the following types of communication behaviours sorted by their frequency: statements (27.2%), directives (23.6%), questions (17.1%), acknowledgements (13.8%), clarifications (10.1%), (2.7%), explanations (1.9%), instructions (1.4%), and suggestions (0.8%).

We categorized the types of communication exchanges and found, in order of frequency: statements (18.9%), requests (18.3%), questions (17.7%), answers (14.1%), replies (10.6%), broadcasts (5.6%), acknowledgements (5.2%), clarifications (3.5%), and read backs (2.9%).

Gigerenzer and Edwards [ 19] reported that frequency statements foster insight and decrease confusion when discussing single-event probabilities.

The frequency of statements across the three types of statements (projects, LOI and priorities) was standardized to give each equal weight when aggregating them to analyze the combined representation of the research portfolio and the agenda-setting process as a whole.

The frequency of statements regarding obtaining consent varied depending on the specialist field.

The frequency of statements on priorities is as would be expected for the population in each region.

Also in concordance with Neumann et al., the frequency of statements of funding source disclosure in analyses pertaining to Germany remained stable over the years.

Based on the verbal protocols, the frequency of statements classified as a rule was rather low, on average 1.6 per participant, and most of the rules concerned secondary prevention.

The low frequency of statements containing a reference to the risk concept could be explained in the same way, since the participants had no immediate access to an aid for calculating risk and were possibly unsure about the general content of such an aid (e.g. the numerical value for ten-year risk that would put the patient into a high-risk category and justify drug treatment).

The frequencies of statements for each income region were expanded proportional to population to make comparisons across regions possible.

The core assumption of a frequency analysis of statements is that the frequency of specific statements indicates the extent to which specific cognitions reflect predominant experiences of study participants (cf. Hull, Levenson, Young, & Sher, 1983 ).