Suggestions(2)
Exact(3)
The circulatory ratio is influenced by the length and frequency of stream.
Over the period of each observation week, herbage quantity declined, and trough use increased, but there was no change in the frequency of stream use.
At site and sector scale, channel morphology varies spatially and in time, but river patterns and drainage texture, or the frequency of stream lines per unit area, together determine the intricacy, or otherwise, of topography.
Similar(57)
It is influenced by the length and frequency of streams, geological structures, land use/land cover, climate, relief and slope of the watershed.
Rc was influenced by the length and frequency of streams, geological structures, land use/land cover, climate, relief and slope of the basin.
The circulator ratio is mainly concerned with the length and frequency of streams, geological structures, land use/land cover, climate, relief and slope of the basin.
Circulatory ratio (R c ) is influenced by the length and frequency of streams, geological structures, land use/land cover, climate, relief and slope of the basin.
The circularity ratio (Rc) is influenced by the length and frequency of streams, geological structures, land use/land cover, climate, relief and slope of the basin (Chopra et al. 2005).
The circulatory ratio is mainly focused on the length and frequency of streams, geological structures, land use/land cover, climate, relief, and slope of the basin (Das et al. 2012).
An original four-year data set that combines high frequency records of stream flow, turbidity, nitrate and dissolved organic carbon concentrations, and piezometric levels was used to characterize storm responses in a headwater agricultural catchment.
The stream flow that is equaled or exceeded 90% of the time (Q90) is one the most used low stream flow indicators in many countries, and its determination is made from the frequency analysis of stream flows considering a historical series.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com