Sentence examples for frequency of statements from inspiring English sources

The frequency of statements regarding obtaining consent varied depending on the specialist field.

The frequency of statements on priorities is as would be expected for the population in each region.

Also in concordance with Neumann et al., the frequency of statements of funding source disclosure in analyses pertaining to Germany remained stable over the years.

Based on the verbal protocols, the frequency of statements classified as a rule was rather low, on average 1.6 per participant, and most of the rules concerned secondary prevention.

The frequency of statements across the three types of statements (projects, LOI and priorities) was standardized to give each equal weight when aggregating them to analyze the combined representation of the research portfolio and the agenda-setting process as a whole.

The low frequency of statements containing a reference to the risk concept could be explained in the same way, since the participants had no immediate access to an aid for calculating risk and were possibly unsure about the general content of such an aid (e.g. the numerical value for ten-year risk that would put the patient into a high-risk category and justify drug treatment).

The frequencies of statements for each income region were expanded proportional to population to make comparisons across regions possible.

The core assumption of a frequency analysis of statements is that the frequency of specific statements indicates the extent to which specific cognitions reflect predominant experiences of study participants (cf. Hull, Levenson, Young, & Sher, 1983 ).

In cases where the raters did not agree, a consensual agreement was subsequently forced in order to allow frequency analysis (Kaspar, Hamborg, Sackmann, & Hesselmann, 2010; Kaspar & König, 2011 ). 5. A frequency analysis of statements was computed with the aid of the category system.

A frequency analysis of statements was computed with the aid of the category system.

Table 1 shows the allocation of the responses to the eight categories differentiated according to "statements for" and "statements against" content by gender, and ranked by frequency of the "statements for" arguments.