Sentence examples for frequency of preference from inspiring English sources

For example, I don't think that any of the preference reversal experiments have yet given information that would allow us to graph the frequency of preference reversals as a function of the difference in expected value (in, say, percentage terms) between the two gambles with which subjects are presented.

Figures display the frequencies with which each strategy was preferred by 3- and 5-year-old children in the three countries as percentages (the frequency of preference divided by the total frequency of all preferences).

To illustrate the role of direct and indirect selection, one can write a general equation for the change in the frequency of preference alleles between generations: (4) Δ p = a P, 0 C PP + a T, 0 C PT Here, Δp is the sum of direct selection and indirect selection.

Again, initial tests showed no differences between dorsal and ventral cells (for each combination of behavioural category and analysis window, χ test on the relative frequency of contralateral preference, ipsilateral preference or no preference, maximum χ2 = 5.4).

I plotted a P,0 for varying frequencies of preference and trait alleles, as well as different cost regimes.

During the latter procedure, both frequency of preferred choice (relative food preference) and reaction time were measured.

The result is that we have an equation describing the strength of selection for (or against) possessing a preference allele: (6) a P, 0 = − α − 1 2 P − 1 1 − T + D P, T 1 − 2 T ⋅ γ α + T − α T 2 Where P is the frequency of the preference allele, T is the frequency of the trait allele, and D P,T is the linkage disequilibrium between preference and trait.

Equation (4) can then be used to partition out how much change in the frequency of a preference allele is due to direct versus indirect selection.

In the early window there was a strong predominance of contralateral preference but in the late window the frequency of contralateral preferences was reduced while the frequency of ipsilateral preferences increased, resulting in roughly equal numbers of cells with preferences for the two sides.

Table 3 displays the frequency counts of preferences for each statement, 497 patients nominated both their most preferred and most disliked descriptions, two patients disliked all of them, 56 did not express any preference, 36 only nominated a preferred description and 10 patients gave only their most disliked description.

For all six radiotracers, strong agreement was observed between the different model selection criteria when examining the frequency of model preferences across all TACs (Fig. 1).