Table 1 lists the frequency of marks found at each chromatin state using training data in the CRF model.
The guidance, though, is clear: they have no specific expectations in terms of frequency, quantity, type or volume of marking.
This condition might be further influenced by the high frequency of sites marked for second review by CAD.
Conversely, if the clonally marked FSCs contain a genetic modification that enhances their ability to occupy the niche or replace wildtype FSCs, unmarked FSCs will be preferentially lost, causing a disproportionate increase in the frequency of fully marked ovarioles.
We measured tail-beat frequency of individually marked fish (focal fish) at a variety of speeds when swimming alone and compared this to their tail-beat frequency when swimming in various positions relative to their closest neighbours.
Moreover, while the frequency of fully marked ovarioles in the control group increased from 0% at 4 dpci (n = 0/157) to 10% at 11 dpci (n = 9/87), no fully marked ovarioles were observed in the experimental group at any time point.
Whereas the frequency and distribution of FSC clones was similar in both groups at 7 dpci (p > 0.33), the frequency of fully marked ovarioles was significantly higher in the experimental group compared to the control group at 21 dpci (18% in wildtype vs 31% in Egfr λtop, p < 0.02).
The frequency of red label marking was enumerated from 25 orthosis designs in Table 1.
In this way, the respondents were required to indicate different degrees of frequency by marking one out of four categories of the scale ("always", "often", "seldom", and "never").
If both the marked and unmarked FSCs are wildtype, they will replace each other at equal rates so the frequencies of fully marked and fully unmarked ovarioles increase at approximately equal rates.
