Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(16)
To evaluate the results, we calculated the error ε for each frequency of gain, phase, and symmetry, as follows: upvarepsilon =frac{mathrm{mean}{left(mathrm{abs}left x-{x}_{mathrm{abs}left x-{xght)}_{mathrm{est}}rightft(mathrights}^2)right)}{mathrm{meane x and xest represent the reference and estimated feature, respectively.
Firstly, we selected those known genes with a high frequency of gain (>40%), that were differentially expressed (n = 629).
For example, 20q has long been recognised as having a high frequency of gain, yet the proposed target gene(s) vary from study to study.
Its revenue and expenditure depend on frequency of gain and loss [ 19].
Gene-level frequency of gain, loss and breakage are calculated using Perl and R scripts.
The frequency of gain in this region varies widely depending on cancer type, from ∼8% to 75%2339 39, 40.
Similar(44)
PIK3CA, encoding the PI3K catalytic subunit, is the oncogene exhibiting a high frequency of gain-of-function mutations leading to PI3K/AKT pathway activation in breast cancer.
Cluster B3 was characterized by the highest frequency of gains on 7p (93%), and the highest frequency of EGFR mutations (93%), although these abnormalities did not coincide.
Minimal common regions (MCR) of gain and loss were defined as the smallest group of contiguous SNPs (≥3) with a high frequency of gains and losses (Z-score threshold ≥2.1) according to the overall distribution of CN values found in the entire tumour cell genome, respectively.
PIK3CA is the oncogene showing the highest frequency of gain-of-function mutations in breast cancer, but the prognostic value of PIK3CA mutation status is controversial.
A genome-wide plot of the distribution of strong chromosomal interaction changes along 23 human chromosomes showed that that the frequency of gain- and loss- interactions in every region (1 Mb resolution) is symmetrically distributed along the chromosomes.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com