"frequency of errors" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It refers to the number or rate at which errors occur in a particular situation or context. It can be used in various contexts, such as in academic writing, data analysis, or quality control discussions. Example: In our analysis, we found a high frequency of errors in the data entry process, leading to inaccurate results.
The United States Transportation Department will investigate the work conditions of Chicago-area air traffic controllers amid an increasing frequency of errors, the agency said.
Researchers discovered that RNA in naked mole rats has a unique structure that greatly reduces the frequency of errors common in rodent proteins.
For the most part, the reporting of medical errors or harm to patients is voluntary, and that "vastly underestimates the frequency of errors and injuries that occur," Dr. Landrigan said.
But the frequency of errors and misconceptions in "Confidence Men" (the publisher says that some corrections will made in later printings) lead the reader to question its broader credibility, in particular its many detailed scenes reconstructed from the memory of often unnamed participants.Even if most of what Mr Suskind writes is factually true, he frequently misses the broader story.
The PDA- and paper-based systems were evaluated based on processing times, frequency of errors, and number of work-hours expended by data collectors.
The challenge with the literature to date is the wide variability in the frequency of errors reported and the reliance on incident reporting practices of busy ED staff.
Rate of skill mastery, frequency of errors, and maintenance of skills under the two prompting conditions were compared via combined multielement and multiple baseline designs.
Varying the ITI within the session produced stimulus duration-independent alterations of detection accuracy but no change in the frequency of errors of omission.
This did not only affect productivity positively but also had second order effects on quality (stoppages increases frequency of errors due to workers' cognitive distraction).
Figure 2 shows the frequency of errors of the back-azimuth estimated using the conventional approach from the dataset as described above.
The frequency of errors, however, was low in both conditions, despite the fact that participants observed the S+ for longer periods than they observed the S-.
