Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Among the dominant features that distinguish halophiles from non-halophiles were the frequency of acidic amino acid residues, and the proteome charge.
Similar(59)
We also observe a selection bias for high frequencies of acidic residues which we hypothesize is a consequence of their critical function(s), further indicating the role of functional constraints operating on NASP evolution.
The frequency of all acidic residues is reduced and contrasts with slightly higher frequencies for the basic amino acids lysine and arginine as well as histidine.
Further, we show that selection has acted to maintain a high frequency of functionally relevant acidic amino acids in the region that interrupts TPR2.
As lifestyles have changed through the decades, the total amount and frequency of consumption of acidic foods and drinks have also changed.
The frequency of dietary acid intake between meals, any habits which involve rinsing acidic drinks around the mouth and the time period the acid is in the mouth are factors to consider when you suspect dietary erosive tooth wear.
Thus, the statistically increased frequency of negatively charged acidic proteins amongst allergens is most consistent with experimental evidence on uptake and processing of antigens by dendritic cells, although this too is speculative.
Our present knowledge about the frequency, magnitude, and duration of acidic sulfate aerosol events and episodes is insufficient.
The second residue has a strong affect on the frequency of acetylation, and in eukaryotes, acidic residues (D, E) stimulate acetylation, while P and basic residues (K and R) inhibit acetylation [59].
Selection has acted to maintain high frequency of these residues in the acidic region suggesting a deviation from neutrality.
At the e and g positions (Fig. 4a), the frequencies of charged amino acids (including acidic amino acids D and E, and basic amino acids R and K) were 49 and 59%%, respectively.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com