Sentence examples for frequencies were excluded from from inspiring English sources

Common marker pairs that differed significantly (p < 0.01) in the recombination frequencies were excluded from mapping.

Haplotypes occurring at less than 1% frequency were excluded from the analysis.

Therefore, the htSNPs with a low minor allele frequency were excluded from further haplotype analysis.

The data from six raters (i.e., five for image variability, and one for subjective word frequency) were excluded from further analysis due to their low consistency with those from other participants (i.e., the correlation coefficients between each participant's value and average of the whole group's on item were not significant).

An alternative, not mutually exclusive possibility, is that as the multiplicity of infection (MOI) decreases with the passage number, a potential R-resistant mutant that is generated with low frequency is excluded from the following passage.

Roesti et al. (2012) suggested that uninformative markers at low frequency be excluded from outlier analyses to increase the power of genome scans.

The HapMap SNPs with no variation in all the four populations (which was determined from the allele frequencies) were excluded in the analysis.

Those SNPs with >10% missing values or a minor allele frequency ≤0.05 were excluded from the data.

We note that this difference disappeared when α0.2 was computed, i.e., when low-frequency variants were excluded from the calculation.

Prior to analysis, SNPs which failed Hardy Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) in the control dataset (p<0.0001) or had poor genotype calling (missing rate greater than 10%) or minor allele frequencies below 10% were excluded from the analysis.

Rare marker combinations with frequencies below 0.05 were excluded from the analysis.