Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
Mailed surveys yielded lower frequencies of misconduct than handed out surveys.
However, it is likely that, if on average 2% of scientists admit to have falsified research at least once and up to 34% admit other questionable research practices, the actual frequencies of misconduct could be higher than this.
Similar(58)
Cochran (2012) explored the frequency of misconduct and patterns of prison visits for male and female inmates in Florida prisons.
The 8-year-old Office of Research Integrity hopes to support studies gauging the frequency of misconduct and assessing efforts to raise ethical standards.
The 8-year-old Office of Research Integrity (ORI), a small unit within the Department of Health and Human Services, hopes to support studies aimed at gauging the frequency of misconduct and how to raise ethical standards.
Surveys asking only opinions or perceptions about the frequency of misconduct were not included.
To measure the frequency of misconduct, different approaches have been employed, and they have produced a corresponding variety of estimates.
This significantly underestimates the real frequency of misconduct, because data fabrication and falsification are rarely reported by whistleblowers (see Results), and are very hard to detect in the data [10].
In particular, the percentage of respondents that recall at least one incident of misconduct is a very rough measure of the frequency of misconduct, because some of the respondents might have committed several frauds, but others might have "sinned" only once.
Ain't Misbehavin' 05 November 2010 Research suggests that social structure, not personal ethics, determines the frequency of scientific misconduct.
Taken for Granted: Ain't Misbehavin' Next, our columnist investigates the impact of the structure of the systems in which we work on the frequency of research misconduct and concludes, with experts on the subject, that science works best without hierarchy.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com