Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
The comparisons of frequencies of levels 1 and 2 findings in ICDC in focal-type and diffuse-type AIP are shown in table 3. The frequencies of level 1 or 2 features in ductal imaging were significantly lower in focal-type AIP (73.1% vs 97.9%, p<0.001, table 3).
Similar(59)
Males showed different frequencies of level 1 aggression dependent on exposure to a receptive female (Friedman test = 15.972, df = 2, p = 0.0003).
In contrast, focal-type AIP had higher frequencies of level 1 or 2 presentations of OOI.
The frequencies of level 1 or 2 features in serology were also lower in focal-type (55.4%vs69.3%%, p=0.075).
We evaluated of the frequencies of level 1 findings, level 2 finding and neither of each criterion in all patients with AIP and PC.
However, they preferred certain values, as illustrated by a histogram of the frequency of levels chosen (fig 6).
Although morning blood glucose levels were higher following intervention nights, the frequency of levels >250 mg/dL (6 vs. 6%) and frequency of morning ketosis (0.1 vs. 0.3%) were similar.
The frequencies of serum level above 280 (level 1) and 140 mg/dL (level 2) were significantly higher in patients with AIP (p<0.001).
We computed the frequency of Level 2 bleaching events as the percentage of years from 1985–2005 with maximum DHW at or above this threshold.
Focal-type AIP had less frequency of level 1 or 2 presentations of ductal imaging and serology.
The relative frequency of level 2 GO terms is visualized in Figure 2. We also compared the representation of records in each generic slim between P. mexicana and P. reticulata.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com