fraudulent representations

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "fraudulent representations" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal contexts or discussions about deceitful claims or statements made to mislead someone. Example: "The company was sued for making fraudulent representations about the effectiveness of their product."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

6 human-written examples

Note that he did not go after DOJ for fining corporations rather than prosecuting the "financial executives" that led the three epidemics of "accounting control fraud" (appraisal fraud, "liar's" loans, and the sale of fraudulently originated mortgages through fraudulent "representations and warranties" to the purchaser).

Huffington Post

In 1971, the Stones launched various lawsuits against Klein and his companies, accusing him of "false or fraudulent" representations.

Independent

Lenders who sold loans to Mac 'n' Mae, after all, agreed to buy back any mortgages that involved fraudulent representations or material misstatements.

The New York Times

For example, where one party obtains property from another by making fraudulent representations, the defrauding party is frequently required to hold the property in trust for the defrauded party.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The head of Angola's secret service made "fraudulent representations" to induce a settlement between two oligarchs warring over their African diamond interests, the high court in London has heard, as a controversial Russian tycoon launched a $1bn claim against a rival known as the King of Diamonds.

The Guardian

The woman apparently licking Bono's breast is Edra Blixseth, a disgraced former billionaire who is at the center of a criminal investigation probing whether she made fraudulent representations about her financial worth to a number of banks.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

52 human-written examples

It's a fraudulent representation.

The New York Times

A petition has been set up calling on the Venice Biennial to "renounce Kenya's fraudulent representation", describing the artists as "a group of well connected persons, who [have] neither the intellectual nor creative capacity to represent Kenya's contemporary art to the international arena".

The Guardian

With the government looking the other way, loan sharking became institutionalized in the U.S. On the fraudulent representation that they are democratizing credit, banks are charging interest rates vastly beyond the recognized 2% time value of money.

Forbes

5. A careful examination of the names behind various independent movements shows that this may as well be the Wall Street wing of the Democratic party, and essentially a fraudulent representation of non-partisanship after Bloomberg failed to fit into the "bi-partisan" model that has destroyed American prestige.

Huffington Post

The law prohibits any "scheme or artifice to defraud" another person of money or property by means of "false or fraudulent pretenses, representations or promises".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "fraudulent representations" when you specifically want to emphasize the deceitful and misleading nature of claims or statements made by one party to another.

Common error

Avoid using "fraudulent representations" when the inaccuracy is unintentional or a simple mistake. Fraud requires intent to deceive; if there was no such intent, terms like "mistaken claims" or "inaccurate statements" are more appropriate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "fraudulent representations" functions primarily as a noun phrase, where "fraudulent" modifies "representations". As Ludwig AI indicates, it denotes statements or claims made with the intent to deceive. Examples show it used to describe deceptive business practices, financial scams, or legal violations.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Encyclopedias

15%

Science

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "fraudulent representations" is a grammatically correct phrase used to describe deceptive claims or statements made with the intent to mislead. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is usable in written English. It appears most frequently in news and legal contexts, indicating a formal and professional register. While not exceedingly common, its usage is consistent and precise, emphasizing the deceptive nature of the information being conveyed. When accuracy and clarity are essential, understanding the distinction between unintentional errors and "fraudulent representations" is critical.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

misrepresentations

A more concise term that refers to false or misleading accounts.

false pretenses

This term focuses on the act of deception through untrue claims.

false statements

A direct and simple way to describe claims that are not true.

misleading statements

Emphasizes the act of leading someone to a wrong conclusion through unclear or deceptive statements.

deceptive practices

This phrase highlights the methods used to deceive, rather than the specific claims made.

dishonest declarations

Focuses on the lack of honesty in the claims or statements made.

deceitful assertions

Implies a deliberate attempt to mislead through declarations.

untruthful assertions

Highlights the lack of truth in the claims being made.

erroneous claims

This suggests the claims are incorrect, whether intentionally or unintentionally.

unsubstantiated claims

Focuses on the lack of evidence to support the claims made.

FAQs

How is "fraudulent representations" typically used in legal contexts?

In legal contexts, "fraudulent representations" often refers to false or misleading statements made with the intent to deceive another party, typically to gain something of value. It's a key element in many fraud-related lawsuits.

What's the difference between "fraudulent representations" and "negligent misrepresentation"?

"Fraudulent representations" involve a deliberate intent to deceive, while "negligent misrepresentation" occurs when someone makes a false statement without reasonable grounds for believing it to be true. The key difference lies in the intent.

What are some alternatives to "fraudulent representations" that still imply deception?

If you want to convey a similar meaning, you could use phrases like "deceptive practices", "misleading statements", or "false pretenses", depending on the specific context.

How does the burden of proof work in cases involving "fraudulent representations"?

In cases of "fraudulent representations", the plaintiff (the party claiming fraud) typically has the burden of proving that the defendant made a false statement, knew it was false, intended to deceive the plaintiff, and that the plaintiff suffered damages as a result of relying on the false statement.