For example, while some researchers have focused on the use of Stephen Toulmin's framework of argument (e.g. Erduran et al. 2004), others have begun to incorporate Douglas Walton's scheme (e.g. Ozdem et al. 2013).
We then present the framework of weighted argument systems.
Following the framework of an argument-based approach to test validation, this study attempts to obtain backing for the Evaluation and Explanation inferences.
Within the Christian framework, a number of arguments for toleration have been developed, based on charity and love for those who err, for example, or on the idea of the two kingdoms and of limited human authority in matters of religious truth, i.e., in matters of the divine kingdom.
Challenges in application include the complexity of water-related ES, a lack of truly interdisciplinary studies and of a coherent ES framework, and the polarization of arguments.
By contrast, the logical framework of Ferguson's argument is obviously inadequate: it simply doesn't give a plausible analysis of the issues at stake.
The increasingly popular framework of Assessment Use Argument proposed in Bachman and Palmer (2010) is specifically designed to enable language testers to "demonstrate to stakeholders that the intended uses of their assessments are justified" (p. 2).
This model was later expanded into the framework of assessment use argument (AUA) (see Bachman and Palmer, 2010), which effectively linked test taker's performance to the decisions made of the test results and the consequences of using an assessment in a particular context.
Due to the dynamics of underlying theories, argument construction is not a monotonic process, which is different from the existing argumentation framework where arguments are constructed incrementally.
Rather, what I mean to state is that, as long as we work from the framework of traditional theory, that argument is still relevant, and assigning importance to the explanatory value of high-level selection proposals is not a straightforward matter.
