framed for

USAGE SUMMARY

"framed for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a person being accused or charged with a crime. For example: "He was framed for crimes he did not commit."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Max is framed for causing a car crash that leaves Phil Mitchell Steve McFaddenn) hospitalised.

Wikipedia

This letter is framed for a reason.

Princeton University

some yesterday, framed for a wall.

The New Yorker

He said he had it specially framed for Mr. Perot.

The New York Times

Gone is the girl (Hilary Handy Amyy framed for stalking.

The Guardian - Film

Bodies are conveniently cropped, filtered and framed for consumption.

The Guardian - Opinion

I've basically been framed for a murder – one that didn't take place".

Independent

James posted the caption: "Legendary!! Getting this framed for the crib".

Independent

Many think he was framed for fighting what they see as a crude campaign against corruption.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

2 human-written examples

These would essentially be Facebook's existing re-engagement ads re-framed for driving immediate purchases.

TechCrunch

Our "wins" have disappeared, or, at best, must be re-framed for ourselves and our children.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "framed for" when you want to emphasize the deliberate nature of a false accusation. For example, "He was "framed for" a crime he didn't commit."

Common error

Avoid using "framed for" when the accusation is simply mistaken, not deliberately fabricated. In cases of honest mistakes, words such as "mistakenly accused" or "wrongly blamed" are more appropriate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "framed for" functions as a passive construction indicating that a subject has been falsely accused of something. As Ludwig AI suggests, it's used to describe someone who has been deliberately set up to take the blame.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Wiki

20%

Science

20%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "framed for" is a grammatically sound and relatively common expression used to indicate that someone has been deliberately and falsely accused of something. As Ludwig AI points out, it suggests injustice and manipulation. While versatile enough for both formal and informal contexts, its prevalence in news and media gives it a neutral register. Alternatives such as "set up for", "falsely accused of", and "wrongfully blamed for" can be used depending on the nuance you wish to convey. Remember to reserve "framed for" for situations where the accusation is not merely a mistake, but a deliberate act of deception.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

set up for

Emphasizes the deliberate act of deception leading to a false accusation.

falsely accused of

Highlights the injustice of the accusation.

wrongfully blamed for

Focuses on the incorrect attribution of responsibility.

implicated in

Suggests involvement through deceitful means.

deceptively charged with

Highlights the deceptive nature of the charges.

falsely implicated in

Highlights the incorrect attribution of involvement in a negative situation or crime.

set up to take the blame for

Emphasizes the setup and the resulting blame.

made a scapegoat for

Highlights the use of someone as a convenient target for blame.

pinned the blame on

Indicates the action of assigning blame, often unfairly.

conspired to accuse of

Emphasizes the conspiracy and the resulting false accusation.

FAQs

How is "framed for" used in a sentence?

Use "framed for" to describe someone who has been deliberately set up to take the blame for something they didn't do. For instance, "He claimed he was "framed for" the crime."

What's a good alternative to "framed for"?

Alternatives include "set up for", "falsely accused of", or "wrongfully blamed for", depending on the specific context.

Which is correct, "framed for" or "framed by"?

"Framed for" is used to indicate the crime or wrongdoing someone is falsely accused of, whereas "framed by" indicates the person or entity responsible for the false accusation.

Is "framed for" a formal or informal expression?

"Framed for" can be used in both formal and informal contexts, but it is generally more common in news reports, legal discussions, and narratives.