Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(12)
Landscape fragmentation, class abundance, the uncertainty in SPM, and the spatial resolution of the remotely sensed data influenced LPIs derived from sub-pixel maps.
Fig. 11 Dominant fragmentation class.
The plots capture the dependency of fragmentation class percentage on height in meters for selected zones in the study area.
Number of cells in each fragmentation class for all selected zones in the study area (delineated in Fig. 5).
The mean canopy height difference between samples in each fragmentation class was determined using an analysis of variance ANOVA for all sample points.
The top left figure shows the most common fragmentation class for each vertical column (2D cell) when we don't consider exterior class.
Similar(48)
Biomass was significantly different between fragmentation classes at an edge distance of 300 m.
Fig. 3 Transition pathways between forest fragmentation types, using fragmentation classes to differentiate between primary and secondary deforestation and degradation.
Core forest is most often transitioned to inner edge and outer edge is more often deforested than other fragmentation classes.
Canopy height was shown to be different within fragmentation classes, which is evidence of structural differences at forest edges.
A subset of the FACET landsat data and derived fragmentation classes show how forest edges occur around villages (Fig. 6).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com