Sentence examples for fractional effects from inspiring English sources

In the HCT116 cell line, however, this combination showed additivity at mid- to high fractional effects using both the simultaneous and the sequential schedules (CI=0.8 1.2).

For a four-component mixture this can be defined by where E(c1), E(c2), E(c3), and E(c4) denote the fractional effects (x%) caused by the individual concentrations c1, c2, c3, and c4 of vinclozolin, finasteride, DEHP, and prochloraz, respectively, and E(cmix) is the total effect of the mixture concentration cmix.

A | The Chancellor said that the Office of Budget Responsibility believed that the new wage would only have a "fractional" effect on jobs.

What he said The OBR today say that the new National Living Wage will have, in their words, only a "fractional" effect on jobs.

Many physicists had hoped to see the fractional effect in graphene as proof that it would be an especially fruitful material to study.

And since its discovery and explanation, says Kivelson, studies of the fractional effect have "led to surprise after surprise after surprise".

The fractional effect is a sign of very strong interactions among the electrons, a condition that can lead to a variety of surprising phenomena and which marks the conceptual frontier in condensed matter physics.

At a fractional effect of 0.5, a synergistic effect occurred between either camptothecin or gemcitabine and felodipine, nifedipine or nitrendipine in Mz-ChA-1 cells.

At a fractional effect of 0.5, all three agents were synergistic with either camptothecin or gemcitabine in Mz-ChA-1 cells in vitro.

CI values below 1 indicate a synergistic anti-proliferative effect, and the CI range values for the combined treatments with thiostrepton/bortezomib in HCT-116, Mia-Paca-2, MDA-MB231 and PA-1 human cancer cell lines were 0.1 to 0.8 (Figure 3A, B, C, D) for fractional effect corresponding to 0.3 to 0.9, suggesting a strong synergistic effect.

These experiments were carried out at target contrast 0.1, which had yielded the smallest inter-subject variation and largest fractional effect in experiment 1. Figure 2 presents perceived target contrast measured in two subjects with luminance steps occurring over windows of three different sizes, ranging from ca. 1 deg to full-field.