Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
Figure 1 Fraction of rejections.
The fraction of rejections is based on 5 % nominal level tests.
Even though we focus in the text on the results obtained when the fraction of rejections is based on the 5 % nominal level tests, the same results hold when the fraction of rejections is based on the 10 % nominal level tests.
Table 5 presents the results of the fraction of rejections based on the 5 and 10 % nominal level tests for both periods for the case of an intercept only and for a specification with an intercept and a linear trend.
Figure 1a shows the fraction of rejections F R (i.e., the proportion of catalogs for which H0 is rejected) of the N and L tests as a function of time.
As can be observed in Table 5, we find evidence of a fraction of rejections close to 1 for both periods with the ADF and WS unit root tests, irrespective of the inclusion of a linear trend in the specification.
Similar(52)
The correct rejection fraction of the corrected analysis was 0.58, while that of the observed analysis was zero.
The correct rejection fraction of the observed analysis, however, was 0 except at correlations greater than approximately 0.7 at low prevalence and 0.8 at high prevalence.
The False Discovery Proportion (FDP) ∑(r i × I i )/ R is the fraction of false rejections over the total number of rejections (Genovese and Wasserman, 2006).
Recompressing a fraction of the flow without heat rejection, results to an increase in thermal efficiency, while the majority of heat transfer occurs in recuperators.
Since events due to cosmic rays tracks account for a significant fraction of the instrument background, their rejection is important to improve the instrument sensitivity.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com