According to TPB, human action or in the case of the present study, the use of BIM, is driven by three types of considerations, namely attitudes towards the action, subjective norms (for e.g., normative expectations of others), and perceived behaviour control (for e.g., control beliefs).
Two types of considerations dictated our choice of the full length CCN3 protein as bait.
In general, three types of considerations should be given: (1) the nature of the hearing loss, (2) patient preferences, and (3) issues related to practical usage.
The selection was driven by two types of considerations: i) Capacity to benefit: these were considered to be LGUs where assistance with planning would be most beneficial, and where the LGU health official is responsive and motivated; ii) Equity: Northern Samar and Eastern Samar are among the poorest provinces in the Philippines, and experience some of the worst MNCH outcomes.
I will discuss three types of consideration: historical, theological, and metaethical.
Applying a life course perspective to the consideration of all four types of explanations while considering that factors from each category may be main exposures, mediators, or moderators creates useful complexity in thinking about how health inequalities arise.
In the study, we take into consideration a categorization of four types of code-anomaly agglomerations.
Consideration of each of the four types of complication separately revealed that all four were reported less often by patients undergoing these procedures in ISTCs (Table 5).
The baseline analysis, with no consideration of uncertainty, indicated all four types of A-CVC were cost-saving relative to uncoated catheters.
